April 30, 2003
GOP lawmakers are preparing to try to alter the legislation in two ways that administration officials said they would like. One change would state explicitly that abstinence and marital fidelity should be the main prevention strategies, followed by condom distribution as a last resort. A second change would give religious groups funded under the plan the right to refuse to use any AIDS-fighting strategy they consider objectionable.
The House bill, sponsored by House International Relations Committee Chair Henry J. Hyde (R-Ill.), largely embodies the White House's plan, although it differs in significant respects. The White House would like to channel $1 billion of the money through the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria. The Hyde bill, however, would allocate $5 billion to the fund. And only the House bill would require that U.S. funds pay for no more than a third of any project that the United States subsidizes. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) said yesterday that he is "intent" on bringing legislation similar to the House version before the Senate by Memorial Day.
Administration officials said Bush favors an amendment by Rep. Joseph Pitts (R-Pa.) to require that at least a third of the money be spent to promote abstinence. But Democrats warned they may withdraw their support if conservatives go too far in deterring the use of condoms. "There's always a danger of having the agreement unravel," said Rep. Tom Lantos (Calif.), senior Democrat on the House International Relations Committee who helped broker the bill with Hyde. "People on our side have equally strong feelings on our preferred approach."
Back to other CDC news for April 30, 2003
Previous Updates | Search the CDC archive
Excerpted from:
Washington Post
04.30.03; Amy Goldstein; Juliet Eilperin