December 2002
Gilead Sciences, the makers of Viread (tenofovir) and soon-to-be custodians of Coviracil (FTC), have announced a plan to distribute tenofovir at no profit to organizations in every country in Africa and in 15 other resource-challenged countries. Providing drugs at cost or even for free is not a new idea. Other companies have launched similar programs that have met with mixed success. Boehringer Ingelheim, for example, has a program to provide free nevirapine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Yet the required paperwork was initially so convoluted and difficult to negotiate, that few were successfully treated.
What sets the Gilead plan apart is the attention given to addressing the problems of actually distributing and dispensing the drug. First, Gilead plans to arrange for direct purchasing by treatment programs in each country. Some small treatment programs have found that drugs offered at an affordable price by a generic maker may have to pass through a third-party wholesaler who can add on significant markups or divert their shipment to another customer willing to pay more. Next, the company has indicated a willingness to provide information and technical assistance to organizations that are interested in adding treatment to their services. The intention, the company says, is to "take appropriate steps to ensure that Viread shipments reach their intended destination and, to the extent possible ... monitor the recipient programs on an ongoing basis to ensure that quality care is being provided."
Realizing effective programs will depend on continued research into both the medical and the operational aspects of delivering treatment in resource-limited settings. Gilead is also a participant in the "Development of Antiretroviral Therapies" (DART) study, a 3,000-patient clinical trial sponsored by the U.K. Medical Research Council scheduled to begin this year in Uganda and Zimbabwe. DART aims to investigate ways to optimize the provision of therapy with simplified protocols and diagnostic tools.
There are more than a few stumbling blocks ahead, even with the company's willingness to smooth the way. To date, no price has been announced and it's possible that Gilead's "no profit" price will exceed what many programs can afford. Then, cheap Viread is fine, but one drug is not enough. What other drugs on what terms will be available to programs that wish to begin offering treatment? Gilead is in the process of acquiring Coviracil, which should prove nicely compatible with Viread, but that won't be available for perhaps another year -- and still, the third leg is missing. If Gilead is serious about making this program work, it should plan to act as the "at-cost" middleman for a full combination, including, say, Viread plus Epivir and Viramune or Sustiva in the package. At the very least, Gilead should pledge not to disqualify or discriminate against programs that plan to use generic versions of these other drugs in their affordable combinations.
The International HIV/AIDS Alliance, along with the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNAIDS, has developed a handbook entitled, "Mobilising NGOs, CBOs and PLHA Groups for Improving Access to HIV/AIDS-Related Treatment." Intended as practical toolkit, the handbook contains a series of training exercises designed to prepare management and staff to deal with the full range of tasks and issues that will accompany undertaking a treatment program, including how to:
Copies of the handbook are available at: www.unaids.org/publications/documents/health/access/NGOtoolkit/index.html
Back to the GMHC Treatment Issues December 2002 contents page.