January 27, 2011
On Nov. 13, 2007, the media widely published the news that several HIV transmissions had resulted after donated organs were transplanted from a deceased high-risk donor. Though this was the first such transmission in 20 years, it prompted an "exaggerated" response by some US transplant surgeons, a new study suggests.
CDC-defined high-risk organ donors (HRDs) include those who, in the past five years, have engaged in specific risk behaviors: men having sex with men, drug injecting, and sex work.
Between January and April 2008, researchers surveyed 422 working US transplant surgeons about their attitudes and practices following the 2007 transmission event.
"The risk of death while waiting for an organ transplant is far higher for many patients than is the risk associated with these organs," said study leader Dr. Dorry Segev of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
In 2009, 14,600 people donated organs, and about 6,700 people died waiting for such a donation. More than 72,000 Americans are on a waiting list for organs.
The 2007 transmission case involved donated organs from a man who had sex with men. Standard antibody tests for hepatitis C and HIV came back negative, and his organs were transplanted into four recipients, who later turned up infected with both viruses. NAT, which can detect more recent HIV infections than antibody tests, is now used at the organ procurement center that distributed the organs in the 2007 case.
The study, "Provider Response to a Rare but Highly Publicized Transmission of HIV Through Solid Organ Transplantation," was published in the Archives of Surgery (2011;146(1):41-45).
01.17.2011; Carla K. Johnson
No comments have been made.
The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our content and advertising policies.
|A Review of Late-Stage HIV Antiretroviral Candidates at IDWeek 2017|
|'Caring at Its Essence': HIV Nurses Recall Pivotal Moments With Patients|
|PrEP Prescriptions Rise Sharply, but Unequally, in New York City|
|How to Reverse Implicit Bias in HIV Care: 6 Steps to Take Today|
|In Their Words: Burdens of HIV Nursing Include Lack of Respect and Resources|
|Conversations With Federal HIV Leaders From the 2017 U.S. Conference on AIDS|