February 11, 2009
|
Listen to Audio (6 min.)
Please note: These files can be quite large. Allow some time for them to download. |
There's nothing like hearing the results of studies directly from those who actually conducted the research. In this interview, you'll meet one of these impressive HIV researchers and read her explanation of a study she presented at CROI 2009.
My name is Mabel Rice; I'm from the University of Kansas. The title of our poster is "Language Impairment in 7- to 16-Year-Old Perinatally HIV-Infected Children." This is a study that's taking a look at a broad set of issues known as HAND, or HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. In particular, we're interested in children's language acquisition. It's a part of cortical functioning that can be affected: The language can be affected [directly], or broader cognitive processes can be affected that, in turn, drive the language impairment.
![]() |
Mabel Rice, Ph.D. |
We had 178. These are children that were perinatally exposed [to HIV] and are HIV positive. Out of those 178, about 33% score low on language assessments. When you subdivide that, about two-thirds of those are youngsters who have cognitive impairment as well. There's a higher risk than we would expect for children to be delayed in language acquisition, even if they are not cognitively impaired.
Mabel Rice et al. CROI 2009; abstract 919. Reprinted with permission. Download the full poster.
The import of all of this is that the kids who are more at risk for these disease indicators are kids who have more pervasive, higher cognitive risk as well. We have to keep our eye on these kids who are just language-impaired.
One of the predictors was having been on protease inhibitor [PI] treatment at study entry [with an odds ratio of approximately 4.0; P = .07 in a multivariate analysis].
Not any particular PI?
Mabel Rice et al. CROI 2009; abstract 919. Reprinted with permission. Download the full poster.
What was the racial breakdown in the children?
It's about 73% African American. We have done more detailed analyses of race as a risk indicator. These analyses indicate that that risk is significant when we look at secondary language impairment versus no impairment -- that is, the more severe, more extensive cognitive impairment, plus language impairment, is where that predictor variable becomes significant.
We have follow-up analyses planned on that, and we have a follow-up group coming along right behind this group [to examine] children who are HIV negative even though they were also perinatally exposed. We'll be able to compare that group with the [children who became] HIV positive out of perinatal exposure, to help sort through some of these other predictor variables as well.
How is this correlated with viral load and CD4 count?
Mabel Rice et al. CROI 2009; abstract 919. Reprinted with permission. Download the full poster.
OK. Thank you very much.
You're very welcome. It's my pleasure. This is my first time at this meeting. My major line of work involves kids with language impairment who are not carrying any other known disease state, so this is a natural complement. I've really enjoyed it.
This transcript has been lightly edited for clarity.
|
Reader Comments:
|
| Please note: Knowledge about HIV changes rapidly. Note the date of this summary's publication, and before treating patients or employing any therapies described in these materials, verify all information independently. If you are a patient, please consult a doctor or other medical professional before acting on any of the information presented in this summary. For a complete listing of our most recent conference coverage, click here. |