May 14, 2003
Dr. Blair T. Johnson and colleagues at the University of Connecticut in Storrs based the findings on a review of 44 studies involving a total of 56 interventions among more than 35,000 people ages 11-18. The impact of HIV prevention efforts was comparable to adolescent programs to prevent smoking, pregnancy and drug use, according to Johnson's team. Despite concerns that talking with students about sex and HIV may increase their sexual activity, this did not occur in the behavioral programs.
"In fact, the effect is just the opposite," Johnson said. The interventions "all pattern essentially in the same direction, reducing sexual frequency." If all adolescents in school participated in intervention programs of comparable scope to those described in the report, "we could avert a ton of infections," he added.
Programs that provided more information about condoms or gave out condoms were more likely to reduce teens' risky behavior, according to the report. In studies in which adolescents in HIV prevention programs that taught students behavioral skills were compared to students who received generic sex education, the gap in risky behavior tended to be larger, with students in the generic sex-ed classes less likely to use condoms. This finding is "our clearest indication that information alone is insufficient to alter condom use behavior," the authors wrote. Most of the data were from studies in North America, Johnson said.
The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our content and advertising policies.