October 26, 2001
At the Athens lipodystrophy meeting, the ESS40002 study reported 24-week lipid data on treatment-naive patients randomized to a protease inhibitor-sparing regimen (AZT+3TC+ABC, n=86), or the protease inhibitor nelfinavir with either AZT+3TC (n=89) or d4T+3TC (n=83). Patients had similar baseline characteristics with CD4 cell counts of 328-359 cells/mm3 and viral loads of 4.0-4.8 log10.
At week 24, virological efficacy was similar across all groups. Cholesterol rose in all arms: 5.8, 21.6 and 29.3 mmol/l in the triple nucleoside, Nelfinavir+AZT+3TC and Nelfinavir+d4T+3TC arms respectively. HDL ("good") cholesterol levels rose 3.6, 2.6 and 3.8 mmol/l, respectively. It is not known why a relatively poorer rise in HDL was seen in the AZT+3TC+Nelfinavir arm -- for LDL levels fell marginally in the triple nucleoside arm and rose by approximately 14 and 22 mmol/l in the protease inhibitor-containing arms, respectively. Differences between males and females regarding changes in lipids were at best modest. Triglycerides rose in all arms: 7.7, 7.5 and 24.2 mmol/l, respectively. It is not known why a greater rise in triglycerides was seen in the d4T-based arm. Rises in CD4 counts favored the protease inhibitor-based therapies, with 90, 132 and 137 cells/mm3 rises observed, respectively over 24 weeks.
Regarding adverse events, diarrhea was seen in just 3% of triple nucleoside patients but 51 and 46% in the nelfinavir groups with AZT+3TC and d4T+3TC, respectively. On the other hand, nausea predominated in the AZT-containing arms with 29% on triple nucleoside and 31% on nelfinavir compared to 17% on d4T. Intriguingly, fatigue was reported in 13% of each of the AZT arms and just 4% of the d4T arms with hematological changes (anemia or low white cells) in 5%, 13% and 1% respectively.
The data support the premise that protease inhibitor-sparing regimens tend to be less lipid-unfriendly than regimens containing currently approved protease inhibitors. Differences in lipid changes as caused by AZT and d4T may exist, but the net effects on the total HDL:cholesterol ratio would be similar. Changes in lipids seem to be similar with regard to gender. In individuals at known risk for future cardiovascular disease (for example, male smokers over 45 with a family history), consideration should be given to using regimens that have the least unfavorable impact on lipids.
|Please note: Knowledge about HIV changes rapidly. Note the date of this summary's publication, and before treating patients or employing any therapies described in these materials, verify all information independently. If you are a patient, please consult a doctor or other medical professional before acting on any of the information presented in this summary. For a complete listing of our most recent conference coverage, click here.|
The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our content and advertising policies.