Neurological Side Effects With Integrase Inhibitors Cause Discontinuations in Clinical Practice

September 14, 2016

An analysis from use of integrase inhibitors in clinical practice reported significantly higher rates of discontinuations related to side effects than seen in clinical studies and includes neurologial complications with dolutegravir.

This was a retrospective analysis presented in an oral presentation at the 18th International Workshop on Comorbidities and Adverse Drug Reactions in HIV by Estéban Martinez from University of Barcelona.1

The study included antiretroviral naive and experienced patients who received a first integrase-inhibitor based ART with at least one follow up visit, with the analysis looking for those who switched treatment within the first year.

Baseline characteristics of 1061 patients in the overall cohort included mean age 45, >80% men, and >50% were gay men. Median CD4 count at diagnosis was >350 (IQR approximately 200 to 550) cells/mm3. Sensitivity analyses were run to allow for the greater use of earlier integrase inhibitors.

The incidence of side-effect related discontinuations was 12.7% for raltegravir (71/557), 8/1% for elvitegravir (26/332) and 12/3% for dolutegravir (26/212). Based on incidence of 270, 167 and 263 events per 1000 patient years of follow up for raltegravir, elvitegravir and dolutegravir respectively, the unadjusted IRR compared to raltegravir was 0.62 (95%CI 0.39 to 0.97) for elvitegravir and 0.97 (95%CI 0.62 to 1.52) for dolutegravir, showing non-significant differences between drugs (p=0.821).

A further analysis for each drug comparing discontinuations for naive compared to experienced patients. Although there were not statistically significant differences for raltegravir (unadjusted IRR 0.64 [95%CI 0.36 to 1.12, p=0.10) or elvitegravir (unIRR 1.66 [95%CI 0.53 to 2.53], p=0.70), with dolutegravir, treatment experienced patients were more likely to discontinue compared to those who were naive (unIRR 3.11 [95%CI 1.03 to 9.39], p=0.03).

Although just over one-third of discontinuations overall (n=44/123) were due to side effects rather than other reasons, there were significant differences between drug: 28% with raltegravir (20/71), 62% with elvitegravir (16/26) and 31% with dolutegravir (8/26); p=0.008). So although elvitegravir was discontinued less frequently, when it was stopped this was more likely to be related to side effects than other reasons.

When categorised by type of side effect, multiple organs were involved but reports of CNS-related symptoms (disorientation, mood changes, sleep disturbance) were notable for similarity to side effects related to efavirenz, albeit at a much lower incidence. See Table 1.

This was reported with each drug but was significantly more important with dolutegravir (88%; 7/8) compared to raltegravir (35%; 7/20) and elvitegravir (19%; 3/16); p=0.005.

In adjusted analysis, only older age associated with overall discontinuations for any reason (adj HR 1.04 (95%CI 1.02 to 1.07; p=0.0007).

Table 1: Side Effects Associated With Early Discontinuation of Integrase Inhibitors
(n=20; 3.6%)
(n=16; 5.0%)
(n=8; 3.8%)
CNS (n=17) 7 (35%) 3 (19%) 7 (88%) 0.005
Muscular (n=12) 3 (15%) 6 (38%) 3 (38%) 0.244
Digestive (n=11) 7 (35%) 4 (25%) 0 0.179
Skin/mucoses (n=6) 4 (20%) 2 (13%) 0 0.456
Systemic (n=5) 2 (10%) 0 3 (38%) 0.224
Respiratory 1 (5%) 0 0 1
Kidney 0 1 0 0.545
Number of organ systems
1 17 (85%) 16 (100%) 5 (63%) 0.066
>1 3 (15%) 0 3 (37%)


All drugs look safest when first approved because by definition when there is actually data limited to only several thousand people. Post marketing reports of side effects nearly always show more complicated problems with wider use.

Although discontinuations were higher than in studies, integrase inhibitors still generally have fewer side effects compared to drugs in other classes. This study is important for highlighting the range of problems that can occur.

Anecdotal reports of neurological problems with dolutegravir shortly after approval were sufficient for i-Base to add this as a side effect in online patient information. This was largely for people who needed to switch away from dolutegravir within the first weeks of treatment.

A similar size study at IAS 2015 reported discontinuation rates of 4.6% for raltegravir (24/522), 8.6% for elvitegravir (26/301) and 3.1% for dolutegravir (9/299).2


  1. Martinez E et al. Tolerability of integrase inhibitors in clinical practice. 18th International Workshop on Comorbidities and Adverse Drug Reactions in HIV, 12-13 September 2016, New York. Oral abstract O25.
  2. Lepik KJ et al. Adverse drug reactions associated with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) in clinical practice: post-marketing experience with raltegravir, elvitegravir-cobicistat and dolutegravir. IAS 2015, Toronto. Poster abstract TuPEB258.

Related Stories

CHAMP: Mobilizing People Living With HIV and Allies to Champion HIV Prevention and Care in Ethno-Racial Communities
Three Non-AIDS Illnesses Tied to Cognitive Impairment in Men With HIV

This article was provided by HIV i-Base. It is a part of the publication HIV Treatment Bulletin. Visit HIV i-Base's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.

No comments have been made.

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:

Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining:


The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our content and advertising policies.