Advertisement

Spotlight Series on Hepatitis C

News

Real-World Hepatitis C Cure Rates Higher With 2 Direct Acting Agents

September 15, 2016

Among patients coinfected with hepatitis C (HCV) and HIV, sustained virologic response 12 weeks after HCV therapy ended (SVR12) was significantly higher with simeprevir (SMV) and sofosbuvir (SOF, Sovaldi) plus ribavirin (RBV) than with SOF/RBV in a two-center study. SVR12 did not differ significantly between SMV/SOF/RBV and SMV/SOF in this 89-person analysis.

HCV/HIV-coinfected patients attain high SVRs with HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in clinical trials, but less is known about how well contemporary DAA regimens promote SVR in real-world clinical practice. SMV and SOF are two well-studied and often-prescribed DAAs. But SMV/SOF has not been formally evaluated in coinfected patients. Clinical researchers at two New York City medical centers conducted this observational analysis to determine how well SMV- and SOF-containing regimens -- with or without RBV -- control HCV in HCV/HIV-coinfected adults.

This observational cohort included all HCV/HIV-coinfected adults with HCV genotype 1 who began a SOF-containing regimen between December 2013 and December 2014 at New York's Mount Sinai Hospital or Brooklyn Hospital Center. Courses lasted 12 weeks for patients taking SMV/SOF or SMV/SOF/RBV and 24 weeks for those taking SOF/RBV. The analysis excluded patients taking a DAA other than SMV or SOF and patients who had previously taken SMV, SOF, daclatasvir (Daklinza) or ledipasvir. The researchers determined SVR12 (1) by intention-to-treat analysis including all patients who began therapy and (2) by per-protocol analysis including patients who completed treatment and follow-up.

Advertisement
The analysis involved 89 HCV/HIV-coinfected adults with a median age of 56 years (interquartile range 51 to 61). Most (96%) were taking antiretroviral therapy, most (78%) were men, 34 (38%) were black and 30 (34%) Hispanic. Median CD4 count stood at 500 cells/mm3, and 68 people (76%) had an HIV load below 20 copies/mL. The study group included 41 people (46%) taking SMV/SOF, 17 (19%) taking SMV/SOF/RBV and 31 (35%) taking SOF/RBV.

By intention-to-treat analysis, 63 of 89 people (71%) achieved SVR12, including 31 of 41 (76%) on SMV/SOF, 16 of 17 (94%) on SMV/SOF/RBV and 16 of 31 (52%) on SOF/RBV. SVR12 was significantly higher with SMV/SOF +/- RBV than with SOF/RBV (81% versus 52%, P < .01) but not significantly higher with SMV/SOF/RBV than with SMV/SOF (94% versus 76%, P = .15). In the per-protocol analysis, 63 of 79 patients attained SVR12, including 31 of 35 (89%) on SMV/SOF, 16 of 16 on SMV/SOF/RBV and 16 of 28 (57%) on SOF/RBV.

Multivariable analysis determined that SMV/SOF/RBV was associated with 18 times higher odds of SVR12 than SOF/RBV (odds ratio [OR] 18.22), but the confidence interval was wide (95% confidence interval [CI] 2 to 165.87). SMV/SOF was not independently associated with higher odds of SVR12 than SOF/RBV (OR 2.26, 95% CI 0.77 to 6.66). Compared with SMV/SOF, SMV/SOF/RBV trended toward significantly greater odds of achieving SVR12 (OR 8.15, 95% CI 0.84 to 79.39, P = .071) in multivariable analysis.

Among 11 patients in whom SMV/SOF +/- RBV failed, one with class C cirrhosis before treatment died after treatment with SMV/SOF. Among patients who did not achieve SVR12 while taking a SMV-containing regimen, three stopped treatment before completing 12 weeks, two of them with serious adverse events: severe abdominal pain and vomiting in one, and lip swelling plus new-onset lower-extremity edema with full-body hyperpigmentation in the other. Clinicians could not establish whether SMV or SOF explained these adverse events.

The authors conclude that "SMV/SOF is an effective option with minimal adverse effects for most HIV-positive patients with HCV [genotype 1]." They caution that "[p]ending further data, SMV should be used with caution in patients with decompensated cirrhosis[.]" They add, "Although SMV may have significant [drug-drug interactions] with [antiretrovirals], SMV/SOF +/- RBV may continue to be a valuable option" for patients in whom an NS5A inhibitor-based regimen has failed.

Mark Mascolini writes about HIV infection.


Copyright © 2016 Remedy Health Media, LLC. All rights reserved.


Related Stories

The Future of Hepatitis C Treatment
High HCV Levels in 33% of Semen Samples From Men With HIV and HCV
Newer Guidelines Widen Statin Treatment Gap in HIV and HCV-Positive Veterans




No comments have been made.
 

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:


Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining:

Advertisement

The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our content and advertising policies.