Advertisement

21st International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2016)

News

No Increased Resistance With Once-Daily Dosing of Abacavir and 3TC Than Twice-Daily Dosing in the ARROW Trial

July 31, 2016

Once-daily dosing of abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) was non-inferior to twice-daily dosing in development of viral resistance in the ARROW trial, according to data presented at the 8th International Workshop on HIV Pediatrics.

The ARROW trial -- conducted in Uganda and Zimbabwe -- showed that once-daily dosing of ABC and 3TC was bioequivalent with twice-daily dosing and gave similar treatment outcomes at 96 weeks.

In a resistance sub study, the ARROW investigators compared the development of viral resistance in children randomised to once vs twice-daily dosing over the course of the trial.

Advertisement
A total of 669 participants receiving twice daily ABC and 3TC containing regimens, for at least 36 weeks, were randomly assigned to continue with twice-daily dosing or switch to once daily. Viral load was tested retrospectively using stored plasma samples at 0, 48 and 96 weeks post randomisation. Samples with >1000 copies/mL were genotyped at the Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda.

Participants were a median age 5.5 years (range 1.8 - 16.9). They had previously received twice daily ABC and 3TC based ART for a median of 1.8 years: 48% with nevirapine; 18% with efavirenz and 34% with AZT.

HIV genotypes were: 49% subtype A; 25% subtype C (including all Zimbawean participants) and 20% subtype A.

The investigators reported no difference between once daily vs twice daily ABC and 3TC in viral suppression at various time points (0, 48 and 96 weeks) and viral load thresholds (<80, <400 and <1000 copies/mL), all p-values non-significant.

There was no difference between once daily and twice daily in drug resistance mutations post baseline (p=0.15). The investigators found, overall 33%, 23% and 28% of participants had the L74V mutation at weeks 0, 48 and 96, respectively. At the same time points 42%, 28% and 34% had Y115F; and 6%, 6% and 5% had K65R. Only one participant receiving once-daily triple NRTIs had Q151M at weeks 48 and 96. The investigators noted that thymidine analogue mutations were rare.

There was also no difference in intermediate/high level resistance to NRTIs between once-daily and twice-daily ABC and 3TC based regimens (p=0.15).

Among the subgroup of participants receiving an NNRTI plus ABC and 3TC regimen (WHO current recommendation) intermediate/high level resistance at 0, 48 and 96 weeks after randomisation was respectively: 15%, 16% and 8% for tenofovir DF and 0%, 4% and 2% for AZT, compared to 75%, 84% and 79% for ABC.

The investigators concluded that both tenofovir DF and AZT are second-line NRTI options for children failing ABC and 3TC based first-line ART.


Reference

Musime V et al. Viral drug resistance in African children taking once- versus twice-daily abacavir and lamivudine in the ARROW trial. 8th International Workshop on HIV Pediatrics. 15-16 July 2016. Durban, South Africa.


Related Stories

Pediatric HIV Cure Studied in Infant Monkeys
New Global Push to Close Pediatric HIV Treatment Gap Launched



Visit HIV i-Base's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
 


No comments have been made.
 

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:


Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining:


Please note: Knowledge about HIV changes rapidly. Note the date of this summary's publication, and before treating patients or employing any therapies described in these materials, verify all information independently. If you are a patient, please consult a doctor or other medical professional before acting on any of the information presented in this summary. For a complete listing of our most recent conference coverage, click here.

Advertisement

The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our content and advertising policies.