The Most Important HIV Study at IDWeek 2015
October 29, 2015
After reporting my choice for the most important HIV study at ICAAC, I received this email from a colleague:
Now she has notoriously high standards -- hard to impress her -- but her opinion notwithstanding, I still think the STRIIVING study has some important messages we can apply to clinical practice today. So I stick by my choice.
Now let me see if I can meet her approval with an IDWeek 2015 (which took place earlier this month) selection. It's another HIV switch study, although this time with a twist. Instead of the usual switch-study population (first regimens, or only those with no history of virologic failure or resistance), it looked at a very different group -- patients who were virologically suppressed but highly treatment-experienced, all with 2-class (or more) resistance, and taking multiple pills a day with a darunavir-based regimen.
Subjects were then randomized to continue their current therapy or switch to the two-pill treatment of elvitegravir-cobicistat-FTC-TAF (ECF-TAF) plus darunavir 800 mg, both once daily. (Thanks to Greg Huhn, the presenting author, for sharing the slides.)
At week 24, 97% vs 91% of the ECF-TAF + DRV vs continued baseline regimen groups had HIV RNA < 50 cop/mL; at week 48, it was 94% and 76%, a significant advantage of ECF-TAF + DRV.
Some comments on this study:
The take home message from this study is that when ECF-TAF is approved, a subset of our patients who are taking complex regimens could safely switch to two pills a day -- ECF-TAF + darunavir.
Finding the right patients will take meticulous scrutiny of their historical genotypes. But of course that's why they pay us the big bucks!
Next year's meeting? October 26-30, New Orleans.
This article was provided by Journal Watch. Journal Watch is a publication of the Massachusetts Medical Society.
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)