Fat Gains After Starting HIV Treatment Associated With High Viral Loads
March 17, 2015
The fat gains experienced after going on antiretroviral therapy may not depend as much on the specific regimen as it depends on whether one had a high viral load before starting treatment, according to a study presented at CROI 2015, in Seattle, Washington.
The study, A5260s, presented by Grace McComsey, M.D., of the Case Western Reserve University, looked for differences in body composition changes in various body compartments (peripheral fat and subcutaneous adipose tissue [SAT], as well as central fat and lean body mass) in people living with HIV initiating treatment on one of two ritonavir (Norvir)-boosted protease inhibitors (atazanavir [Reyataz] or darunavir [Prezista]) or an integrase-based regimen over 96 weeks.
"Regardless of the regimen that you look at, the fat gains were so much more, if you start with very high viral load."
However, the study didn't find any fat gain differences based on treatment regimen. Instead, the researchers found associations with other factors that were present at baseline (when individuals went on treatment). Specifically, having a high viral load when starting treatment was most consistently associated with body composition changes after starting antiretroviral therapy.
"I think it was amazing -- regardless of the regimen that you look at, the fat gains were so much more, if you start with very high viral load, and if you adjust for the inflammation markers, viral load remained by itself associated with higher gains," said McComsey.
Even though there has been a decline in the incidence of lipoatrophy (fat wasting) with the use of nucleoside or nucleotide analogue drugs that are more mitochondria-friendly, increased body fat (central adiposity or lipohypertrophy) continues to occur in people initiating antiretroviral therapy.
The pathogenesis of lipohypertrophy remains unclear. Initially, it was blamed on protease inhibitors, however, studies showed that switching off of protease inhibitors to either non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), such as efavirenz (Sustiva, Stocrin), or more recently to integrase inhibitors, did not significantly improve central fat. Although, in at least one study, the use of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir was associated with greater gains in both peripheral and central fat compared to the use of efavirenz. However, there had not been any well-powered studies comparing changes in body composition in people initiating protease inhibitors versus those starting on integrase inhibitors.
Therefore, McComsey and colleagues conducted A5260s, a metabolic and cardiovascular sub-study of A5257, which had enrolled more than 1,800 treatment-naive individuals living with HIV with a viral load of at least 1,000 copies/mL. The study had randomized individuals to three NNRTI-sparing regimens: tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) with either atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, or raltegravir (Isentress). The participants were also stratified according to baseline viral load ≥ or < 100,000 copies/mL, or having a low or high Framingham 10-year risk score of coronary heart disease.
The sub-study included 328 participants, and had specific exclusion criteria: no known cardiovascular disease, no diabetes and no use of lipid-lowering agents. At baseline and at week 96, the sub-study participants underwent a DXA scan as well as a computed tomography (CT) of their visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat.
At baseline, measurements were taken of leptin, adiponectin (which are both involved in fat metabolism and regulation) and selected inflammatory markers and monocyte activation markers (IL-6, hs-CRP, D-dimer, sCD14, sCD163).
The baseline characteristics of the study participants were very well balanced between the arms. The median age was 36; 90% of the participants were male and 40% were white non-Hispanic. About one third of participants were in the high viral load strata. The body mass index (BMI) median was 25, and the body composition at baseline was very similar to or in line with other U.S. treatment initiation studies in the era of starting antiretroviral therapy with a higher CD4 count, according to McComsey.
There were two measures of peripheral fat: limb fat by DXA and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) by CT.
There were two measures of central fat: trunk fat by DXA and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) by CT.
This article was provided by TheBodyPRO. It is a part of the publication The 22nd Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2015).
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)
The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our content and advertising policies.