< Prev |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Next >
ADAPs With Waiting Lists
(1,125 individuals in 7 states*, as of August 9, 2012) |
| State |
Number of Individuals on ADAP Waiting List |
Percent of the Total ADAP Waiting List |
Increase/Decrease From Previous Reporting Period |
Date Waiting List Began |
| Alabama |
102 |
9% |
-20 |
April 2012 |
| Florida |
31 |
3% |
0 |
June 2010 |
| Georgia |
223 |
20% |
-32 |
July 2010 |
| Louisiana**
|
285 |
25% |
-41 |
June 2010 |
| North Carolina |
3 |
.2% |
3 |
January 2010 |
| South Dakota |
4 |
.4% |
4 |
August 2012 |
| Virginia |
477 |
42% |
-12 |
November 2010 |
|
* As a result of FY2012 ADAP emergency funding, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, and Virginia were able to reduce the overall number of individuals on their waiting lists.
** Louisiana has a capped enrollment on their program. This number represents their current unmet need.
|
ADAPs With Other Cost-Containment Strategies: Financial Eligibility (Instituted Since September 2009, as of August 2, 2012)
Six ADAPs have previously lowered their financial eligibility as part of their cost-containment plans since September 2009. Illinois, North Dakota, Ohio and South Carolina lowered their eligibility level to 300 % FPL. Utah lowered its eligibility level to 250% FPL. Arkansas lowered its eligibility level to 200% FPL. Previously, income eligibility for the states noted above was 400% FPL or higher. As a result of these measures, a total of 445 individuals in three states (Arkansas -- 99, Ohio -- 257, and Utah -- 89) were disenrolled. Illinois, North Dakota, and South Carolina grandfathered clients that were previously eligible based on their income level into their programs. No other ADAPs currently anticipate further changes to their financial eligibility.
< Prev |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Next >
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please
read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)